|
Clinical Negligence: Conrad has an extensive clinical negligence practice, acting for both claimants and defendants. Cases in which Conrad has acted include those involving: cerebral palsy; cancer cases (including lung cancer); macular degeneration; retinal detachment; spinal fusion surgery; DVT; cosmetic surgery; perforated eardrums; stapedectomy; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; and artificial sphincter surgery, amongst others. Conrad has extensive experience of fatal accidents cases in a clinical context, including cases involving dehydration, DVT, septicaemia and suicide following inappropriate discharge from psychiatric care. He has advised on contractual issues under the “Contract for the Provision of Waiting List Initiative Work.
Dental Negligence Conrad has advised and pleaded extensively in dental negligence claims. He has advised on the issues of vicarious liability for 'dental associates', and the question of whether a prison owes a non-delegable duty of care to provide dental treatment.
Disciplinary: Conrad acts for clinicians in disciplinary tribunals, including the GMC, GDC and NMC. Conrad also has experience of representing doctors at internal PCT hearings and FHSAA appeals. Conrad acted as a junior to Nicola Davies QC in the successful appeal to the High Court of Sir Roy Meadow from the GMC decision against him (Meadow v General Medical Council [2006] EWHC 146 (Admin) [QBD]).”
Coroners' Inquests: Conrad has extensive experience of representing clinicians and families at coroners’ inquests. He has acted in many cases in which Article 2 is engaged. He has been involved in judicial review of Coroners’ decisions, including those as to the scope of inquest.
Personal Injury: Conrad has considerable experience representing both Claimants and Defendants in high-value personal injury trials, interlocutory hearings and applications on behalf of both parties. He also has extensive experience advising and drafting statements of case on behalf of both Claimants and Defendants.
Public law: Conrad appears in judicial reviews with a medical context. See Fraser & Short v NICE & BB in reported cases section below.
|