Sitemap

Andrew Hockton

CALLED TO THE BAR 1984

Junior Counsel


Medical Profile

Background

 

Balliol College, Oxford (Classics scholar) BA
City University Dip. Law
1984 Called to the bar

 

Email: ahockton@3serjeantsinn.com



General Information

 


Directory Comments

 

Andrew has been cited as a leader in his fields of practice (clinical negligence and professional discipline) in the directories for many years.

 

The following are samples of recent comment in the legal directories:

 

Andrew Hockton is 'a regular feature in doctors and dentists disciplinary proceedings' Chambers and Partners 2010

 
 Andrew Hockton is an immensely "reliable and determined barrister,"  Chambers and Partners 2010

 

 

Legal 500 2009

 

Recommended as a leader in the field (in the top tier) of clinical negligence and healthcare.

 

"Andrew Hockton is one of our preferred counsel for complex and difficult cases."

 

Chambers 2009

 

Recommended in the fields of clinical negligence and professional negligence;

 

Andrew Hockton is “very committed and dedicated.” He has “a low-key approach;” clients comment that “he’s not a battering ram, but approaches things sensibly, calmly and meticulously.”

 

“clever and experienced all-rounder”

  

Chambers 2006

 

Recommended as a leader in the fields of clinical negligence and professional negligence;

 

Under clinical negligence : He “has a knack for looking at the wider picture”

 

Under professional discipline: he “has impressed legal assessors and clients for “the quality of his thinking on his feet.” He has particular experience in cases involving issues of consent to treatment, as well as human rights and Privy Council cases.



Nature of Practice

 

Medical law

 

(a)     Clinical negligence

 

Instructed in clinical negligence claims on behalf of claimants and defendants. Substantial experience in high value claims involving cerebral palsy/catastrophic injury. Involved in benzodiazepine group litigation. Regularly advises on legal aspects of claims in relation to issues of disclosure, confidentiality, expert evidence, limitation and the nature and extent of the duty of care.

  

(b) Consent/emergency treatment applications/human rights

 

Has a special interest in cases involving issues of consent/human rights. Instructed on behalf of patients and their families, Trusts, the Official Solicitor and CAFCASS. Recent cases have involved PVS, withdrawal of ventilation/nutrition and hydration from terminally ill children and adults, treatment of Jehovah’s witnesses, force-feeding patients/prisoners, treatment of mental health patients, advance directives, treatment of HIV patients and issues of confidentiality involving HIV patients.

 

(c)  disciplinary proceedings

 

A leading practitioner in the professional disciplinary field for over 15 years. Regularly defends practitioners before the various committees of the GMC and the GDC. Has also appeared before other professional bodies (vets and psychologists). Instructed on behalf of some of the country’s leading medical practitioners, including Professor Behan, the expert in the CJD litigation (found not guilty of serious professional misconduct). Recent cases have included GMC v Gibson (arising out of the Kent and Canterbury cytology inquiry - case dismissed); GMC v Mr Rostron (consultant orthopaedic surgeon and well-known medico-legal expert: case dismissed-fitness to practise not impaired); GMC v Dr Gill (GP-fitness to practise not impaired); GMC v Mr Batchelor (internationally renowned plastic surgeon- fitness to practise not  impaired); GMC v Dr Hashmi (surgeon- case dismissed- fitness to practise not impaired); GMC v Dr Nehikhare (consultant geriatrician-fitness to practise not impaired); Calhaem v GMC (Admin Court); Sharief v GMC (Admin Court); Sacha v GMC (Admin Court). Recent substantial cases before the GDC include GDC v White; GDC v Schmullian; GDC v Zietsman; GDC v Marshall; GDC v Butt. Regular appearances before the Privy Council and Administrative Court in disciplinary cases. Successfully challenged the role of specialist advisers in performance cases (Watson v GMC). 

 

(d) Crime

 

Instructed in substantial criminal cases involving medical/dental practitioners. Cases involve issues of indecency/ dishonesty/gross negligence manslaughter

  

(e) Inquests

 

Regularly instructed on behalf of Trusts and individual doctors (in particular, forensic medical examiners and prison doctors) in inquests with a medical component. Cases in 2006/7 involved deaths in hospital, prison and police custody.

 

(f) Mental Health/inquiries

 

Instructed in cases involving treatment issues relating to mental health patients. In 2006/7 instructed on behalf of the consultant psychiatrist in a major homicide inquiry (the Trafford Inquiry)



Specialist Information

 


Reported and other cases of Interest

 

Reported cases in the field of negligence include:

 

ES (by her mother and litigation friend) v Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Royal NHS Trust CA [2004] Lloyds Rep Med. 90

Briggs v Pitt Payne CA [1999] Lloyds Rep Med (limitation)

O’ Keefe v Harvey-Kemble CA [1998] 45 BMLR 94

Powell v Boladz CA [1998] Lloyds Rep Med 116 (scope of doctor’s duty of care)

Saxby v Morgan CA MLR 1997 (limitation in drugs cases)

 

Reported cases in the field of medical consent/human rights include:

 

H (a healthcare worker) v Associated Newspapers Ltd and H (a healthcare worker) v N (a Health Authority) CA [2002] Lloyds Rep Med 210 (privacy/confidentiality of HIV healthcare worker; “look back” exercise; Articles 8 and 10 ECHR; freedom of the press; instructed on behalf of healthcare worker)

Re A (conjoined twins) CA [2001] Fam 147 (separation of conjoined twins; best interests; Article 2 of ECHR; instructed on behalf of O/S)

NHS Trust v D [2000] 2 FLR 677 (withdrawal of treatment; Articles 2 and 3 of ECHR; instructed on behalf of O/S)

R v Portsmouth NHS Trust ex p. Glass CA [1999] 2 FLR 905 (judicial review of treatment decision; instructed on behalf of O/S)

In re T (a minor)(liver transplant: consent) CA 1997 1 WLR 242 (instructed on behalf of the family)

 

 

Reported cases in the disciplinary field include

 

Sosanya v GMC [2009]

Sharief v GMC [2009] LS Law 389

Calhaem v GMC [2008] LS Law 96

CRHP v GDC [2006] Admin Court 92 BMLR 36

Razzaq v GMC [2006] Admin Court 91 BMLR 108

Watson v GMC Admin Court [2005] Lloyds Rep Med 435

Dr Carruthers v GMC [PC] [2003] BMLR 75

Dr Misra v GMC  [PC] [2003] 72 BMLR 108

Dr Silver v GMC  [PC] [2003] Lloyds Rep Med

Dr Norton v GMC [PC] [2002] 68 BMLR 169

 

Other notable cases in the disciplinary field

 

Hospital inquiries under HC 90 (9) involving inter alia cervical smears, liver transplant surgery and feto-maternal medicine. Also instructed on behalf of PCTs  and practitioners before the FHSAA. Recent cases include:

 

Dr Singh Kumar v Bolton PCT (instructed for appellant: appeal allowed)

Emmanuel v Leeds West PCT (instructed for respondent PCT: appeal dismissed)

Dr Franklin v Staffordshire Moorlands PCT (instructed for appellant: appeal allowed)

 

Reported cases in hospital disciplinary inquiries

 

Saeed v Wolverhampton NHS Trust CA [2001] Lloyds Rep Med 111

 

Reported criminal cases

 

R v Witts & Witts CA [1991] Crim L.R. 562

 

Criminal cases include:

 

R v Patel (GP- indecent assault)

R v Bainbridge (dental practitioner-manslaughter)

R v Nadarajah (GP-indecent assault)

R v Havutcu (SHO-benefit fraud)

R v Inthiraraj (GP-indecent assault)

R v Suryanarya (GP: fitness to plead and indecent assault)

R v Sacha (GP-indecent assault)

R v Deodhar (GP-indecent assault)

R v Yadav (SHO-indecent assault)

R v Pepperman (GP-indecent assault)

R v Joseph (rheumatologist: indecent assault)



Clients

 


Publications

 

Law of Consent to Medical Treatment, Sweet & Maxwell 2002

Clinical Negligence (4th ed) 2008, ed Powers, Harris, Barton:  Chapter on Consent



Lectures and Seminars

 
Lectures regularly on medico-legal topics.



Related Professional Activities

 


Other Information